Interviews & document review
Structured conversations with leadership, programs, M&E and IT, plus a read of your plans and past proposals. We agree exactly what gets a deep look.
Where AI can genuinely help your work, where it can't, and what to do next. Specific enough to take straight into a board meeting — and grounded in what real engineering can actually build.
Every assessment ends with the same things in your hands, plus a half-day working session to take your team through them properly.
A written AI plan — plain-language, board-ready, with a one-page summary at the front.
A capability and gap read specific to how you actually operate, not boilerplate.
A recommended sequence of next steps, each with rough timing and a budget range.
A data and governance check — what you have, what's usable, what needs fixing first.
Named tool and vendor recommendations sized to your context — not “it depends.”
A half-day working session with your team — to walk through the findings together, pressure-test them, and leave aligned on the next steps.
A thirty-day follow-up call — by which point you'll have new questions.
The engagement runs like a delivery: each step produces something you can check, so nothing lands as a shock in the final week.
Structured conversations with leadership, programs, M&E and IT, plus a read of your plans and past proposals. We agree exactly what gets a deep look.
What we heard, checked against your data, your governance posture, and your real field conditions. We model what AI would look like for you — and where it would fail.
You get the plan a few days ahead, then a half-day working session with your team: what we found, what we recommend, and what to do next — with real time to dig in and challenge it.
Where AI plausibly helps your mission — and where it would just distract from it.
What you have, what's clean, what's usable, what's missing. Often the real first project.
What you can defend to a board, a donor, or a ministry — and to the people you serve.
Power, signal, devices, languages, digital literacy at your sites — where demo-AI usually dies.
What your staff can run today, what they could learn, what would need a vendor.
How you'll actually pick what to build and when to start. Lock this in and the next year gets easier.
No hourly billing. We set the scope — and the price — in the first conversation.
A short document — usually eight to fifteen pages — written for a non-technical reader, with a one-page summary, cost ranges, a recommended sequence, and clear “do this, not that” calls. You should be able to print it and hand it across a table without explaining it.
Yes, where the question calls for it. We name the models, hosting options and tools we'd use for each scenario, and explain the trade-offs. We have opinions and we put them in writing.
That's a common finding. The plan names what to fix and roughly how long it takes. If data is the real constraint, we'll say so and recommend that as the first project — not an AI build.
Sometimes, yes. If the honest answer is “fix these things first,” that goes in the plan. We'd rather give you a useful “wait” than a wasted pilot.
A short call is enough to scope it. If the honest answer is “not yet,” we'll tell you.